References & Links

Opensource

1. Matthias Bärwolff, Robert A. Gehring, and Bernd Lutterbeck, editors. Open Source Jahrbuch 2005: Zwi-
   schen Softwareentwicklung und Gesellschaftsmodell, Berlin, March 2005. Lehmanns Media – LOB.de.
   Available online at http://www.opensourcejahrbuch.de/2005/; visited on April 21th 2005.
2. Andreas Bauer and Markus Pizka. Der Beitrag freier Software zur Software-Evolution. In Bärwolff et al.
   [2], pages 95 – 112. Available online at http://www.opensourcejahrbuch.de/2005/; visited on
   April 21th 2005.
   
3. C. Y. Baldwin y K. B. Clark. "The architecture of coopera-
     tion: How code architecture mitigates free riding in the open
     source development model". Harvard Business School, 43
     pages,        2003.   <http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/baldwinclark.pdf>.
4. BarraPunto, the community site for the Spanish libre software
     community. <http://barrapunto.com>
5. J. Bessen. "Open source software: Free provision of complex public
     g o o d s " . Research on Innovation, 2002. <http://www.researchoninnovation.org/online.htm# oss>
6.  J. Bessen. "Open Source Software: Free Provision of Com-
    plex Public Goods." <http://www.researchoninnovation.org/opensrc.pdf>, 2001 .
7.  J. Boyle. The second enclosure movement and the construc-
    tion of the public domain. Law and Contemporary Prob-
    lems. 66(1-2): 33-75, 2003.
8.  D. W. Bromley et al. Making the Commons Work: Theory,
    Practice, and Policy (ICS Press, San Francisco, 1992.
9.  A. Capiluppi, P. Lago, and M. Morisio. "Evidences in the
    Evolution of OS projects through Changelog Analyses," In
    J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam, and K. Lakhani (eds.)
    Taking Stock of the Bazaar: Proceedings of the 3rd Work-
    s h o p on Open Source Software Engineering. <http://opensource.ucc.ie/icse2003>, 2003.
10.  K. Crowston, H. Annabi, and J. Howison. "Defining Open
      Source Project Success." In Proceedings of the 24th Interna-
      tional Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2003).
      Seattle, WA, 2003.
11.  Crowston, Annabi, Howison, and Masango. "Towards a Port-
      f o l i o of FLOSS Project Success Measures." In Feller,
      Fitzgerald, Hissam, and Lakhani (eds.) Collaboration, Con-
      flict and Control: The Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on
      Open Source Software Engineering. Edinburg, Scotland,
      2004.
12.  K. Crowston and B. Scozzi. "Open Source Software Projects
      as Virtual Organizations: Competency Rallying for Soft-
      ware Development," IEE Proceedings Software (149:1), pp.
      3-17, 2002.
13. L. Dahlander. "Appropriating returns from open innovation
      processes: A multiple case study of small firms in open source
      software". School of Technology Management and Econom-
      ics, Chalmers University of Technology, 24 pages, 2004.
      <http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/dahlander.pdf.>
14.  J-M. Dalle, P.A. David, R.A. Ghosh, and F.A. Wolak. "Free
     & Open Source Software Developers and ‘the Economy of
     Regard’: Participation and Code-Signing in the Modules of
     the Linux Kernel." <http://siepr.stanford.edu/programs/OpenSoftware_David/Economy-of-Regard_8+_OWLS.pdf>, 2004.
15. C. DiBona, S. Ockman, and M. Stone (eds.). Open Sources:
      Voices from the Open Source Revolution. O’Reilly and Associ-
      ates, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1999. Available at <http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/opensources/book/toc.html>
16.  T. Dietz, E. Ostrom, and P. Stern. "The Struggle to Govern
     the Commons." Science 302(5652). pp. 1907-1912, 2003.
17. M. Divitini, L. Jaccheri, E. Monteiro, and H. Traetteberg.
    "Open Source Processes: No Place for Politics?". In J. Fel-
    ler, B. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam, and K. Lakhani (eds.) Taking
    Stock of the Bazaar: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Open
    Source Software Engineering. <http://opensource.ucc.ie/icse2003>, 2003.
18. J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S.A. Hissam, and K.R. Lakhani (eds.).
      Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software. The MIT Press,
      Boston, Massachusetts, 2005.
19. J. Feller and B. Fitzgerald. Understanding Open Source Soft-
      ware Development. Addison-Wesley, London, 2002.
20. Joseph Feller, Brian Fitzgerald, Frank Hecker, Scott Hissam, Karim Lakhani, and André van der Hoek, edi-
    tors. Meeting Challenges and Surviving Success: The 2nd Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering.
    ACM, 2002. Available online at http://opensource.ucc.ie/icse2002/; visited January 14th 2005.
21. Joseph Feller, Brian Fitzgerald, Scott Hissam, and Karim Lakhani, editors. Taking Stock of the Bazaar:
    Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering. ACM, 2003. Available online at
    http://opensource.ucc.ie/icse2003/; visited June 28th 2005.
22. Joseph Feller, Brian Fitzgerald, Scott A. Hissam, and Karim R. Lakhani, editors. Perspectives on Free and
    Open Source Software, Cambridge, July 2005. The MIT Press Ltd.
23. Joseph Feller, Brian Fitzgerald, and André van der Hoek, editors. Making Sense of the Bazaar: 1st Workshop
    on Open Source Software Engineering. ACM, 2001. Available online at http://opensource.ucc.ie/icse2001/; visited June 19th 2005.
24. Roy T. Fielding, James D. Herbsleb, and Audris Mockus. Two Case Studies of Open Source Software
    Development: Apache and Mozilla. In Feller et al. [11], pages 163 – 209.
25.  FLOSS, Free/Libre Open Source Software Research. <http://floss.syr.edu/>, 2005.
26.  K. Fogel and M. Bar. Open Source Development with CVS.
     Scottsdale, AZ: Coriolis, 2001.
27. Free Software Foundation. Where it all comes from.... <http://fsf.org>
28. Juan Mateos Garcia and W. Edward Steinmueller. The Open Source Way of Working: A New Paradigm for
    the Division of Labour in Software Development?, January 2003. Available online at http://siepr.stanford.edu/programs/OpenSoftware_David/oswp1.pdf; visited on October 24th 2005.
29.  J.M. Garcia. "Quantitative Analysis of the Structure and Dy-
     namics of the Sourceforge Project and Developer Populations:
     Prospective Research Themes and Methodologies." <http://siepr. stanford.edu/programs/OpenSoftware_David/JuanM-
     G_FOSS-PopDyn_Report2+.pdf>, 2004.
30.  C. Genthon. "Le libre et l’industrie des services et logiciels
      i n f o r m a t i q u e " . RNTL, 2001. <http://www-eco.enst-bretagne.fr/Etudes_projets/RNTL/workshop1/genthon.pdf>, workshop.
31. Rishab Aiyer Ghosh, Bernhard Krieger, Ruediger Glott, Gregorio Robles, and Thorsten Wichmann.
    Free/Libre and Open Source Software: Survey and Study – FLOSS. Final Report, International Institute
    of Infonomics University of Maastricht, The Netherlands; Berlecon Research GmbH Berlin, Germany, Ju-
    ne 2002. Available online at http://www.infonomics.nl/FLOSS/report/index.htm; visited
    January 18th 2005.
32.  R.A. Ghosh and V.V. Prakash. "The Orbiten Free Software
     Survey." First Monday (5) 7. <http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue5_7/ghosh/>, 2000.
33.  R.A. Ghosh, G. Robles, and R. Glott. Free/Libre and Open
     Source Software: Survey and Study. Technical report. Inter-
     national Institute of Infonomics. University of Maastricht, The Netherlands. June. <http://www.infonomics.nl/FLOSS/
    report/index.htm>, 2002.
34.  R.W. Hahn. "Government Policy Toward Open Source Soft-
      ware: An Overview." In R. W. Hahn (ed.) Government Policy
      toward Open Source Software. Washington, D.C.: AEI-
      Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, 2002.
35.  K. Healy and A. Schussman. "The Ecology of Open-Source
     S o f t w a r e Development." Available at <http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/ healyschussman.pdf>, 2003.
36.  C. Hess and E. Ostrom. "Ideas, Artifacts and Facilities: In-
     formation as a Common-Pool Resource. Law and Contem-
     porary Problems. 66(1&2), 2003.
37.  C. Hess and E. Ostrom. "A Framework for Analyzing Schol-
     arly Communication as a Commons." Presented at the Work-
     shop on Scholarly Communication as a Commons, Work-
     shop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana Uni-
     versity, Bloomington, IN, March 31-April 2, 2004. <http://dlc.dlib. indiana. edu/archive/00001244/>.
38.  S. Hissam, C.B. Weinstock, D. Plaksoh, and J. Asundi. Per-
     spectives on Open Source Software. Technical report CMU/
     SEI-2001-TR-019, Carnegie Mellon University. <http://w w w. s e i . c m u . e d u / p u b l i c a t i o n s / d o c u m e n t s / 0 1 . r e p o r t s /01tr019.html>, 2001.
39. F. Horn. "Company strategies for the freeing of a software
      source code: opportunities and difficulties". In [23, pp. 99-
      122], 2002.
40. N. Jullien. "Linux: la convergence du monde Unix et du
      monde PC". Terminal, 80/81: 43-70. Special issue, Le
      logiciel libre, 1999
41. N. Jullien. "Impact du logiciel libre sur l’industrie
      informatique". PhD, Université de Bretagne Occidentale /
      ENST Bretagne, mention: sciences économiques, 307 pages,
      N o v e m b r e 2001. <http://www-eco.enst-bretagne.fr/Etudes_projets/RNTL/documents_universitaires.html>.
42.  N. Jullien. "Le marché francophone du logiciel libre". Systèmes
      d’Information et Management, 8 (1): 77-100, 2003.
43. N. Jullien, M. Clément-Fontaine, y J.-M. Dalle. "New economic
      models, new software industry economy". Technical Report,
      RNTL (French National Network for Software Technologies)
      project, 202 pages, 2002. <http://www-eco.enst-bretagne.fr/Etudes_ projets/RNTL/>.
44. S. Koch (ed.). Free/Open Source Software Development. Idea
      Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, 2004
45.  Peter Kollock. "The Economies of Online Cooperation: Gifts
     and Public Goods in Computer Communities." In Commu-
     n i t i e s in Cyberspace, edited by Marc Smith and Peter
     Kollock. London: Routledge, 1999.
46.  S. Krishnamurthy. "Cave or Community? An Empirical Ex-
     amination of 100 Mature Open Source Projects." FirstMonday
     7, 2002.
47. A. Günes Koru and Jeff Tian. Defect Handling in Medium and Large Open Source Projects. IEEE Software,
    21(4):54 – 61, 2004.
48. K. Lakhani y E. von Hippel. "How open source software
     works: Free user to user assistance". Research Policy, 32:
     9 2 3 - 9 4 3 , 2003. <http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/lakhanivonhippelusersupport.pdf>.
49.  A.M. St. Laurent. Understanding Open Source and Free Soft-
     ware Licensing. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly, 2004.
50.  Libre Software Engineering. <http://libresoft.urjc.es/>, 2005.
51.  T. R. Madanmohan and Rahul De. Open Source Reuse in Commercial Firms. IEEE Software, 21(6):62 –
     69, 2004.
52.  D. McGowan. Legal Implications of Open Source Software.
     University of Illinois Review, 241 (1): 241-304, 2001.
53. Jan Tobias Mühlberg (2006). Software-Engineering und Software-Qualität in Open-Source-Projekten.  Department of Computer Science
         University of York. EMail:  muehlber@cs.york.ac.uk
54.  E. Moglen. "Anarchism Triumphant: Free Software and the
     Death of Copyright." First Monday, 4. August, 1999.
55.  A. Nuvolari. "Open Source Software Development: Some
     Historical Perspectives." Eindoven Center for Innovation
     Studies, Working paper 03.01. <http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/nuvolari.pdf>, 2003.
56. V. Matellán Olivera, J.M. González Barahona, P. de las Heras
      Q u i r ó s , G. Robles Martínez (eds.). Sobre software libre. 
    C o m p i l a c i ó n de ensayos sobre software libre. GSYC,
      U n i v e r s i d a d Rey Juan Carlos, 2003. Available at <http://gsyc.escet.urjc.es/~grex/sobre-libre/>. (In Spanish.)
57. Opensource, a collection of publicly accessible papers about libre
      software. <http://opensource.mit.edu>.
58. Open Source Initiative (OSI). <http://opensource.org>
59.  E. Ostrom. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of
    Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge
    University Press, 1990.
60.  E. Ostrom, R. Gardner, and J.K. Walker. Rules, Games, and
     Common-Pool Resources, Ann Arbor: University of Michi-
     gan Press, 1994.
61. V. Ostrom and E. Ostrom. "Public Goods and Public
     Choices." In Alternatives for Delivering Public Services:
     Toward Improved Performance. E.S. Savas (editor). Boul-
     der, Colo: Westview Press. pp. 7-49, 1977.
62. J. Ousterhout. "Free software needs profit". Communications
     of the ACM, 42 (4): 44-45, April 1999.
63. E.S. Raymond. The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux
      and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. O’Reilly and
      Associates, Sebastopol, California, 1999. Eric Steven Raymond. (The Cathedral and the Bazaar. Website, 2000. Available online at http://www.
     catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral- bazaar/; visited on January 9th 2005.)
64. E. S. Raymond. "The Cathedral and the Bazaar", 1998.  <http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/writ ings/cathedral-bazaar/>.
65. E. S. Raymond. "Homesteading the Noosphere", 1998. <http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/wri tings/homesteading/>
66.  G. Robles-Martinez, JM. Gonzalez-Barahona, J. Centeno-
     Gonzalez, V. Matellan-Olivera, and L. Rodero-Merino.
     "Studying the Evolution of Libre Software Projects Using
     Publically Available Data. In J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S.
     Hissam, and K. Lakhani (eds.) Taking Stock of the Bazaar:
     Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Open Source Software
     Engineering. <http://opensource.ucc.ie/icse2003>, 2003.
67.  L. Rosen. Open Source Licensing. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
     Prentice Hall, 2005.
68. Ioannis Samoladas, Ioannis Stamelos, Lefteris Angelis, and Apostolos Oikonomou. Open Source Software
    Development Should Strive for Even Greater Code Maintainability. Communications of the ACM, 47(10):83
    – 87, October 2004.
69. Charles M. Schweik (2005). An Institutional Analysis Approach to
     Studying Libre Software ‘Commons’. In: UPGRADE Vol. VI, No. 3, June 2005, pp.17-27
70.  C.M. Schweik, T. Evans, and J.M. Grove. "Open Source
     and Open Content: A Framework for the Development of
     Social-Ecological Research." Ecology and Society (pending
     publication).
71.  C.M. Schweik and A. Semenov. The Institutional Design of
     "Open Source" Programming: Implications for Addressing
     Complex Public Policy and Management Problems. First
     Monday 8(1). <http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue8_1/schweik/>, 2003.
72.  M. Shaikh and T. Cornford. "Version Management Tools:
     CVS to BK in the Linux Kernel." In J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald,
     S. Hissam, and K. Lakhani (eds.) Taking Stock of the Ba-
     zaar: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Open Source Soft-
     ware Engineering. <http://opensource.ucc.ie/icse2003>,
     2003.
73.  Sharma, Sugmaran, and Rajgopalan. "A Framework for Cre-
     ating Hybrid-Open Source Software Communities." Infor-
     mation Systems Journal. 12:7-25, 2002.
74. Stephen R. Schach, Bo Jin, David R. Wright, Gillian Z. Heller, and A. Jefferson Offutt. Maintainability of
    the Linux Kernel. IEE Proceedings - Software, 149(1):18 – 23, 2002.
75. R.M. Stallman. Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of
      Richard M. Stallman. GNU Press, Boston, Massachusetts, 2002.
      Also avalaible at <http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/fsfs/rms-essays.pdf >
76. Richard M. Stallman. Why Software Should Be Free. Website, July 2005. Available online at http:
    //www.gnu.org/philosophy/shouldbefree.html; visited on July 22nd 2005.
77.  Slashdot, the community site for the worldwide opensource software
      community. <http://slashdot.org>.
78. Sourceforge, the largest hosting site for libre software projects.
      <http://sourceforge.net>
79.  K. Stewart. Open Source Software Development Research
     P r o j e c t . <http://www.rhsmith.umd.edu/faculty/kstewart/
     ResearchInfo/KJSResearch.htm>, 2005.
80.  K. Stewart. "OSS Project Success: From Internal Dynamics
     to External Impact." In Proceedings of the 4th Annual Work-
     shop on Open Source Software Engineering. Edinburgh,
     Scotland. May 25th , 2004.
81. Michael P. Voightmann and Charles P. Coleman. Open Source Methodologies and Mission Critical Software
    Development. In Feller et al. [10], pages 137 – 141. Available online at http://opensource.ucc.ie/icse2003/; visited June 28th 2005.
82.  S. Weber. The Success of Open Source. Cambridge, MA:
     Harvard University Press, 2004.
83.  R. van Wendel de Joode, J.A. de Bruijin, and M.J.G. van
     Eeten. Protecting the Virtual Commons: Self Organizing
     Open Source and Free Software Communities and Innova-
     tive Intellectual Property Regimes. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser
     Press, 2003.
84. Brian Witten, Carl Landwehr, and Michael Caloyannides. Does Open Source Improve System Security?
    IEEE Software, 18(4):57 – 61, 2001.
85. Juhani Warsta and Pekka Abrahamsson. Is Open Source Software Development Essentially an Agile Me-
    thod? In Feller et al. [10], pages 143 – 147. Available online at http://opensource.ucc.ie/icse2003/; visited June 28th 2005.
86. J.-B. Zimmermann. "Un régime de droit d’auteur: la propriété
      intellectuelle du logiciel". Réseaux, 88-89: 91-106, 1998.
87. J.-B. Zimmermann. "Logiciel et propriété intellectuelle: du
      copyright au copyleft". Terminal, 80/81: 95-116. Special
      Issue, Le logiciel libre, 1999.

Engineering Models

1. Beck, Kent. 2000. Extreme Programming Explained – Embrace Change. Reading MA:
    Addison-Wesley.
2. Kent Beck. Test-Driven Development. Addison-Wesley, München, 2003.
3. Barry W. Boehm. A spiral model of software develpoment and maintenance. IEEE Computer, 21(5):61 –
   72, May 1988.
4. Börger, E. (2002). The Origins and the Development of the ASM Method for High Level System Design and Analysis. In: Journal of Universal Computer Science 8(1), 2-74.
5.  Börger, E., & Stärk, R. (2003). Abstract State Machines. A Method for High-Level System Design. Heidelberg - New York: Springer
6. Brooks, Fredrick P. 1987. No silver bullet: essence and accidents of software engineering.
    IEEE Computer 20 (4):10-19
7. Cusumano, Michael, and Richard Selby. 1995. Microsoft Secrets: How the World's
    Most Powerful Software Company Creates Technology, Shapes Markets, and
    Manages People. Free Press.
8.  Gurevich, Y. (2001). Logician in the land of OS: abstract state machines in Microsoft. In: Computer Science, 2001. Proceedings. 16th Annual IEEE Symposium on, 129 - 136
9. Niels Jørgensen. Putting it all in the Trunk: Incremental Software Development in the FreeBSD Open Source
   Project. Information Systems Journal, 11(4):321 – 336, 2001.
10.  Huggins, J. (2006). Abstract State Machines. At: URL: [WWW] http://www.eecs.umich.edu/gasm/cover.html
11. Iivari, J. 1996. Why are CASE tools not used? Communications of the ACM 30 (10):94-103.
12. Muehlberg (2006). Software-Engineering und Software-Qualität in Open-Source-Projekten.URL: http://zeus.fh-brandenburg.de/~muehlber/content/vortraege/ossjb2006-sweq/ossjb2006-sweq.pdf
13.  Meilir Page-Jones. The practical guide to structured systems design. Yourdon Press Computing Series, New
     York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1988.
14. Raymond, Eric S. 2001. The Cathedral & the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open
     Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly and Associates.
15. Jason E.Robbins (2003). Adopting Open Source Software Engineering (OSSE) Practices by Adopting OSSE Tools. To appear in Making Sense of the Bazaar: Perspectives on Open Source and Free Software, J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam & K. Lakham (Eds.) Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly & Associates. Forthcoming Fall 2003. University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3425 USA jrobbins@ics.uci.edu URL: http://www.ics.uci.edu/~wscacchi/Papers/New/Robbins-msotb-OSSE-Aug03.pdf
16. Software Programm managers Network (SPMN): URL: http://www.spmn.com/aboutus.html
17. Wiegers, Karl. 2002. Peer Reviews in Software: A Practical Guide. Boston, MA:
     Addison-Wesley.

CDEs

1. SourceCast.org
2. SourceForge.org

3. TIGRIS.org URL: http://www.tigris.org/

4. The TOPCASED project: a Toolkit in Open source for Critical Aeronautic SystEms Design. URL: http://www.sciences.univ-nantes.fr/lina/atl/www/papers/eTX2006/21-MarcPantel.pdf

Collaboration

1. C. Tzu-Ying y L. Jen-Fang. "A comparative study of online
     user communities involvement in product innovation and
     development". National Cheng Chi University of Technol-
     ogy and Innovation Management, Taiwan, 29 pages, 2004.
     <http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/chanlee.pdf>.

Environments

1. ....

Tools

1. Jelly. URL: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jelly/

2. Maven: http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-10-2002/jw-1011-maven.html

Languages

1. Bottoni, P., & Chang, Sh.-K. , & Costabile, M.F., & Levialdi, St., & Mussio, P. (2002). Modeling Visual Interactive Systems Through Dynamic Visual Languages. in: IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART A: SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, VOL. 32, NO. 6, NOVEMBER, 654-669
2.  Bottoni, B., & Costabile, M. F. , & Levialdi, S. , & Mussio, P. (1997). Defining Visual Languages for Interactive Computing. in: IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART A: SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, VOL. 27, NO. 6, 773-783
3.  Burnett, M. (2006). Visual Language Research Bibliography. URL: [WWW] http://web.engr.oregonstate.edu/~burnett/vpl.html

4. Chang, S.-K. (997). Visual Languages. [URL]http://www.cs.pitt.edu/~chang/365/vpl.html

5. DiaGen-Homepage. (2006). URL: [WWW] http://www.unibw.de/inf2/DiaGen/
6.  DIAPLAN-Homepage (2006). URL: [WWW] http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~hof/Diaplan/index_d.htm
7. Dewar, R. (2002). Case Study: Space Station Robot Embeds Ada.Despite rumors of its demise, Ada is at the heart of the international Space Station's in-orbit Canadaarm 2  where it assures software safety and reliability. In: COTS Journal, March 2002, pp.87-92
8.  Klein, R. (2004). Ein Interpreter für Diaplan, eine regelbasierte Sprache zum Programmieren mit Graphen und Diagrammen. Universität Bremen. Diplomarbeit (see also: URL: [WWW] http://www.tzi.de/~hof/Diaplan/pub_d.htm)
9. Stärk, R.F., & Schmid,J., & Börger, E. (2001). Java and the Java Virtual Machine. Definition, Verification, Validation. Heidelber: Springer-Verlag GmbH

1. Wind River Platform For Safety Critical ARINC 653. URL: http://www.windriver.com/products/runtime_platforms/platform_for_safety_critical_arinc_653/

Theories

1.  Ackermann, D., & Taubner, M.J. (1990). Mental Models and Human-Computer Interaction 1. Amsterdam - New York - Oxford - Tokyo: North Holland
2.  Alhazbi, S.M. (2004). Measuring the complexity of component-based system architecture. in: Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications, 2004. Proceedings. 2004 International Conference on, 593-594

3. American Society of Safety Engineers. URL:http://www.asse.org/

4.  Berka, K. (1983). Scales of Measurement. in: Cohen, R. S., & Wartofsky, M. W. (Eds). Language, Logic, and Method. Dordrecht - Boston - Londo: D.Reidel Publishing Company, 1-73
5.  Bowler, P.J. (1989). Evolution – The History of an Idea. Berkeley. (rev.ed.). University of California Press
6.  Briand, L., & Morasca, S., & Basili, V.R. (1994). Property-based Software Engineering Measurement. Technical Report, University of Maryland CS-TR-3368, pp.1-28

7. CALIBRATION Industry Forum. URL: http://www.calibre.ie/forum/index.php

8.  Deacon, T.W. (1997). The Symbolic Species. The Co Evolution of Language and the Brain. New York - London: W.W.Norton & Company
9.  Doeben-Henisch, G. (2006a). Reconstructing Human Intelligence within Computational Sciences - Seen from a Theory of Science Point of View. In Loula, A., & Gudwin, R., & Queiroz, J., (eds). Artificial Cognition Systems. (will be published 2006).
10.  Doeben-Henisch, G. (2006b). Reinforcing the Global Heartbeat - Introducing the Planet Earth simulator Project. In M.Faßler, & C. Terkowsky (eds.). Urban Fiction. Die Zukunft des Städtischen. München (Germany) (will be published 2006).
11.  Ehrig, H., & Engels, G., & Kreowski, H-J., & Rozenberg, G., (Eds) (1999). Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing. Vol.2. Singapore - New Jersey - London: World Scientific.
12.  Ehrig, H., & Kreowski, H-J., Montanari, U., & Rozenberg, G., (Eds) (1999). Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing. Vol.3. Singapore - New Jersey - London: World Scientific.
13.  Ehrig, H. & Juhas, G. & Padberg, J. & Rozenberg, G.(Eds.) (2001).Unifying Petri Nets. Advances in Petri Nets.Berlin - Heidelberg - New York: Springer
14.  Erasmus, L. D., & Döben-Henisch, G., & Bodenstein, C. P. (2004). A Model of the Real Neuron. In IEEE Africon 2004, vol.2: pp.1071-1078.
15.  Erasmus, L. D., & Bodenstein, C. P. (2004). Real Neurons, Artificial Intelligence Based on the Mechanisms of Biological Intelligence. In IEEE Africon 2004, vol.1: pp.423-428
16.  Estes, W.K. (ed) (1975). Handbook of Learning and Cognitive Processes. Vol.1-2. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
17.  Estes,W.K. (ed) (1976). Handbook of Learning and Cognitive Processes. Vol.3-4. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
18.  Faber, M., & Heracles, R. (2004). Graph Grammatiken. MS Lehrstuhl f. Informatik RTWH Aachen. Seminarunterlagen
19.  Figge, U. L. (1994). Semiotic principles and systems: Biological foundations of semiotics. In Nöth, W. (ed)(1994), pp.25-36
20.  Garey, M.R., & Johnson, D.S. (1979). Computers and Intractability. A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. San Francisco: W.H.Freeman and Company
21.  Gecseg, F., & Steinby, M. (1997). Tree Languages. in: Rozenberg, G., & Salomaa, A. (eds.). Handbook of Formal Languages. Vol.2. Beyond words. Berlin - Heidelberg - New York: Springer, 1-68
22.  Giraud, C., & Valk, R. (2003). Petri Nets for Systems Engineering. A Guide to Modeling, Verification, and Applications. Berlin - Heidelberg - New York: Springer
23.  Gough, K.J. (2001). Stacking them up: a comparison of virtual machines. In: Computer Systems Architecture Conference, 2001. ACSAC 2001. Proceedings. 6th Australasian, 55 - 61
24.  Hauser, M.D. (1996). The Evolution of Communication. Cambridge (MA) - London: MIT Press
25.  Haykin, S. (1999). Neural Networks. A Comprehensive Foundation (2nd ed.) Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall
26.  Hilgard, E.R., & Atkinson, R.L., & Atkinson, R.C. (1979). Introduction to Psychology. (7th ed). New York et al: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc.
27. Hoffmann, B., Minas, M. (2001). Transformation of shaped nested graphs and diagrams. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 59(4), 2001. Proc. 2nd International Workshop on Rule-based Programming (RULE 2001), affiliated with Principles, Logics, and Implementations of High-Level Programming Language (PLI 2001). September 4, 2001, Firenze, Italy. Elsevier, 305-319
28.  Hoffmann, B., Minas., M. (2000). Towards generic rule-based visual programming. In Proc. 2000 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages (VL'2000), Seattle, Washington: IEEE Computer Society Press, Sept. 2000, 65-66.
29.  Husserl, E. (1955ff). Edmund Husserl - Gesammelte Werke, Aufgrund des Nachlasses veröffentlichte Schriften in Gemeinschaft mit dem Husserl-Archiv an der Universität Köln vom Husserl-Archiv (Louvain) unter Leitung von H.L. Van Breda, Den Haag.
30.  Kant, I. (1781/1787, 1956). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Bd.505 Philos.Bibliothek. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag
31.  Kinsner, W. (2004). Is entropy suitable to characterize data and signals for cognitive informatics? in: Cognitive Informatics, 2004. Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on, 6-21.
32.  Klix,F. (1980). Information und Verhalten. Kybernetische Aspekte der organismischen Informationsverarbeitung. Einführung in die naturwissenschaftliche Grundlagen der Allgemeinen Psychologie, Berlin: VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften
33.  Krumke, S.O., & Noltemeier, H. (2005). Graphentheoretische Konzepte und Algorithmen. Wiesbaden: B.G.Teubner-Verlag/GWV Fachverlag GmbH
34.  Küppers, B.-O. (1990). Der Ursprung biologischer Information. Zur Naturphilosophie der Lebensentstehung. (2nd ed.). München-Zürich: Piper Verlag
35.  Levialdi, S. (2001). Visual languages: concepts, constructs and claims. in: Information Technology Interfaces, 2001. ITI 2001. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on,29-33
36.  Lieberman, Ph. (1984). The Biology and Evolution of Language. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press
37.  Lorenz, K. (1965). Evolution and Modification of behaviour. Chicago: University Press
38.  Lorenz, K. (1983). Die Rückseite des Spiegels. Versuch einer Naturgeschichte menschlichen Erkennens. München: Pieper
39.  Maas, W., & Bishop, Chr.M. (Eds.)(1999). Pulsed Neural Networks.Cambridge (MA) - London: The MIT Press
40.  Mayr, E. (1988). Eine neue Philosophie der Biologie. Darmstadt (Germany): Wissenschaftl. Buchgesellschaft
41.  Misra, S, & Misra, A.K. (2004). Evaluating cognitive complexity measure with Weyuker properties.in: Cognitive Informatics, 2004. Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on ..., 103-108.
42.  Murch, G.M., & Woodworth, G. L. (1978). Wahrnehmung. Stuttgart et al: W.Kohlhammer Verlag
43.  Petitot, J., & Varela, F. J., & Pachoud, B., & Roy, J. - M. (Eds.). (1999). Naturalizing Phenomenology. Issues in Contemporary Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
44.  Plunkett, K. &Elman, J.L. (1997). Exercises in Rethinking Innateness. A Handbook for Connectionist Simulations. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press
45.  A.Rosenberg (1985). The Structure of Biological Science. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
46.  Rozenberg, G. (Ed) (1997). Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing. Vol.1. Singapore - New Jersey - London: World Scientific.
47.  Rozenberg, G., & Salomaa, A. (Eds) (1997). Handbook of Formal Languages. Vol.1-3).Berlin - Heidelberg - New York: Springer
48.  Schlick, C.M., & Winkelholz, C., & Motz, F., & Brutting, M. (2003). Complexity and human-computer interaction. In: Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2003. IEEE International Conference on, 2360-2367
49.  Shell, D.A., & Mataric, M.J.(2003). Human motion-based environment complexity measures for robotics. in: Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2003. (IROS 2003). Proceedings. 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on. 2559 - 2564
50.  Schiff, W. (1980). Perception: An Applied Approach. Boston et al:Houghton Mifflin Company
51.  Schürr, A. (1997). Programmed Graph Replacement Systems. MS Lehrstuhl f. Informatik III, RTWH Aachen. email: [MAILTO] andy@i3.informatik.rtwh-aachen.de
52.  Shiffrin, R.M. (1976). Capacity Limitations in Information Processing, Attention, and Memory. In W.K.Estes (ed). Handbook of Learning and Cognitive Processes. Vol.4, 177-236

53. Jeff Tian () Papers in SCS Topics. URL: http://engr.smu.edu/~tian/home/abs.html

54. UPGRADE. UPGRADE is the European Journal for the Informatics Professional, published bimonthly at <http://www.upgrade-cepis.org/> independent, non-commercial, and freely distributed electronic publication (ISSN 1684-5285).

55.  Ward, P.D., & Brownlee, D. (2000). Rare Earth. Why Complex Life is Uncommon in the Universe. New York: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
56.  Weingarten, M. (1993). Organismen – Objekte oder Subjekte der Evolution, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft

Revision: 2006/08/14 - 00:40 - © OS-PE.org